Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
12 janvier 2012 4 12 /01 /janvier /2012 22:00

111024 mclaren dunsfold594Avec la nouvelle année, voici l'occasion de faire un rapide bilan de la première année de production de la MP4-12C. Et force est de constater que tout n'a pas été rose, loin de là ! Tout d'abord, McLaren a enregistré de sérieux retards de production, des rappels (électriques, électroniques notamment) sur les premiers véhicules livrés, poussant Ron Dennis à émettre un courrier à ses clients. Le système IRIS qui semblait faire la fierté de la marque n'est par ailleurs semble-t-il toujours pas opérationnel. Lancer un véhicule aussi complexe de 0, dans une nouvelle structure et une nouvelle usine qui plus est, n'est pas chose aisée et sans être une excuse, on peut aisément comprendre les problèmes rencontrés par McLaren.
Plus décevant est l'accueil très mitigé reçu par la voiture dans la presse anglo-saxonne, qui lui a réservé un véritable tir de barrage lors des essais publiés en juin. Bien sûr, il faut relativiser, les commentaires ne sont pas si négatifs que cela et la voiture est tout de même un remarquable produit, mais alors qu'on attendait une volée de 5 étoiles après des prises en main élogieuses, tel ne fut pas le cas. Au premier rang des critiques : le son (corrigé semble-t-il depuis), les freins, un comportement insuffisamment joueur et ne laissant pas assez de libertés au conducteur (les plus virulents sur ce points étant les journalistes de Fifth Gear). Les aspects positifs: le moteur, la transmission (bien que les palettes ne fassent pas l'unanimité) et les suspensions (encore que de petits problèmes de mise au points aient été reportés). Les choses ne se sont pas arrangées lors de l'élection de la voiture de l'année, Autocar et Auto Express plaçant la MP4-12C en milieu de peloton, alors qu'Evo l'a élu deuxième juste derrière la Porsche 911 GT3 RS. Seuls Top Gear et Jeremy Clarkson se sont montrés stables et positifs dans leur opinion sur cette voiture.
L'accueil a été un peu plus favorable sur le continent, où peu de magazines l'ont testée (Sport Auto et Auto Motor und Sport en Allemagne, Quattroruote en Italie). Si elle échoue là aussi dans ses comparatifs face à la Ferrari 458 Italia ou la Lamborghini Aventador, les commentaires sont néanmoins plus favorables et les résultats du supertest de Sport Auto particulièrement convaincants - à l'exception du comportement sur piste mouillée, décevant et comparable à ce qu'à obtenu Autocar.
Pour finir sur une note d'espoir, il faut garder à l'esprit que l'ensemble (ou presque) des essais a été fait sur des véhicules de pré-production ou bien de tous premiers modèles et que McLaren a procédé depuis à un certain nombre d'ajustements. On peut donc espérer des essais plus favorables en 2012... à commencer par le Sport Auto français à la fin du mois de janvier.

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 janvier 2012 1 09 /01 /janvier /2012 22:00

Another article from the same source (Ricardo) as previous, this time related to the assembly process of the engine.

New Ricardo engine assembly facility 3One of the biggest challenges of the programme was not just to design and test a new engine ready for production in just 18 months, but to design the assembly process and the 600 square metre plant in which to produce it as well. Ground was broken in April 2010 and the plant was production ready, just four months later, in August 2010. “It is a model factory showing how things should be done,” says Ricardo assembly facility production manager Tom Soar.

An obvious question to ask is why the facility is sited in the UK and not in a low cost location: “We can achieve low cost just as well as anyone else,” explains Soar, and his views are echoed by no less a figure than Ron Dennis, executive chairman of the McLaren Group: “Several people have asked me why here, in England. I’m fiercely patriotic and we are desperately trying to communicate the importance of science and engineering for our country,” he says. “We came to Ricardo because we had a firm belief in its capability, its science, experience and commitment to excellence.”

The manufacturing building provides a semi clean-room environment with a positive air pressure system; it is modular, allowing for easy extension, and a BIPO cell (bed-in and pass-off engine dynamometer cell station) is integral. The production philosophy is one of lean manufacturing and the line is organised on a single piece flow (one engine per station), no faults forward basis; the line can take any engine in any order. It has been specified on the basis of producing 2000 M838T engines per shift per year. Stock control is operated on a ‘pull’ system (where stock control is based on production needs) and there is a 45-minute takt time – the cycle time before each unit moves to the next station. Two idle stations allow for an increase in production numbers at short notice.

13 assembly stations

The cylinder heads are assembled and set up on a discrete six-point line to one side of the hall, while the main line of 10 stations is positioned in the centre of the hall. There are also two sub-assembly stations, making a total of 13 in all. The highly sophisticated cylinder head production line not only builds the cylinder heads with valves, collets, springs, followers and stem seals but ‘pops’ the valves to ensure they are properly seated. It also performs a leak test on them, installs the camshafts and confirms all components are present.

All stations have a sophisticated human machine interface (HMI) which contains details of the work, indicates the tool to be used and keeps track of the status and cycle time. An HMI also controls parts bin selection, warning operators if they are about to select the wrong part. Rechargeable DC battery tools are pre-set and used for fastening, measuring rotations, angle and torque: all of these readings are stored in a database giving a full birth history of each engine. Once each operation is complete an operator acknowledges the fact with a step completion button. The job is only unlocked ready for the next station if all steps are completed.

Liquid gaskets are applied by machine and seal integrity is checked with an air pressure liquid leak detector and, if necessary, by using hydrogen gas and a sniffer.

Final stage: testing and power check

The final stage is for the engine to be bedded in, testing all the engine’s functions and also checking power and torque output. The sophisticated BIPO cell used for this stage incorporates hardware from three main UK suppliers and is operated using ST ARS software. The powerful dynamometer is rated at 460 kW and incorporates automated docking and undocking and coolant and oil fill. It also pre-heats the fluids and is equipped with a number of safety systems including an FM200 fire suppression system, smoke and flame detectors and explosion protection.

Once the BIPO session is complete, engines are ready for delivery to McLaren Production Centre in Woking, with a consignment leaving every working day.

Partager cet article
Repost0
9 janvier 2012 1 09 /01 /janvier /2012 21:00

I found an interesting article on Ricardo's website related to the MP4-12C engine. Link to the pdf were the article copied below has been published.

OPR33In some ways the M838T is a classic design, a 90 degree V8 with a flat-plane crank and four valves per cylinder. But despite that superficial orthodoxy and despite its extraordinary robustness, there is nothing ordinary about the specification of the new McLaren V8: in fact, it is cutting edge in almost every respect. The engine has the lowest CO2 emissions in its class – just 279 g/km – and meets both EU5 and ULEV2 emissions standards. Power output is a thrilling 600 PS at 7500 rev/min, matched by 600 Nm torque at 3000 rev/min. Thanks to clever fundamental design the compact cylinder block has an exceptionally low mass: not only are the main and lower bedplate crankcases sand cast in aluminium alloy, but so are the top-hung, wet cylinder liners, a feature which saves an additional 4 kg compared to conventional cast iron liners. Careful targeting of the sand cores helps keep the weight down too, and the finished assembly comes in at just 36 kg. The flat-plane crankshaft allows a smaller counterweight radius and, combined with the short stroke, this allows a low block height of just 201 mm and a crank-to-ground centre line height – important for road-holding – of only 121 mm. Dry-sump lubrication also allows low positioning of the engine in the chassis and this helps create the lowest possible centre of gravity for the MP4-12C. 

So-called picture-frame sealing eliminates T-joints in the crankcase assembly and thus the risk of oil leaks, while high levels of feature integration (as opposed to separate components and covers) not only reduces component count and weight, but also the likelihood of faults such as coolant leaks.

Ricardo’s analysis tools played a crucial role in designing a high-quality and robust engine, and their use in the development of the cylinder block is a particularly good example. “We did encounter some difficulties and we are quite open about that,” admits Yates. What is important, though, is how those inevitable hurdles were identified and quickly overcome. Early on in the development phase there were some instances of liner cracking, for example, but by looking closely at the clearances, the support and how the liner was loaded and clamped, these problems were quickly eradicated.

Pumping losses (the energy expended pumping air into and around an engine) are a major source of wasted energy and increased fuel consumption. In the new V8, Ricardo isolated crankcase bays one and four from two and three and also isolated the timing chain case from the crankcase bays. This prevents the transfer or, literally, the pumping, of air between the bays and through internal passages: this significantly improves both power and fuel consumption at high speeds.

Top end design

The cylinder head is one of the most important assemblies in any engine, and its design makes a particularly important contribution to the performance, emissions and fuel consumption characteristics. In this case, each of the two cylinder heads has double overhead camshafts, each camshaft being fitted with its own phaser. Like the block, the cylinder heads are optimized for weight, single-piece plastic cam covers giving a net weight saving of 2.3 kg and an aluminium rocker carrier and thin-wall spark plug tube saving a further 2.5 kg.

The narrow included valve angle reduces the width (and weight) of the head and an integrated housing for the variable valve timing gear enables compact oilways and minimises the overall length of the heads. Again, from the perspective of quality and robustness, single-plane oil sealing rules out oil leaks.

Needless to say, the head design is minutely optimized to maximise performance and minimise fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. Exhaust valve size is maximised to avoid gas flow restriction and to increase the available turbine energy. Intake ports are designed to provide excellent gas flow while retaining good tumble characteristics for efficient fuel-air mixing. The high flow rate reduces pumping losses and the tumble helps low-speed combustion as well as improving fuel economy at high speed. The quadruple cam phasers improve response, torque, power and fuel economy throughout the engine speed range.

The valvetrain features end-pivoted finger followers and a single ‘beehive’ design of valve spring, the low mass and high stiffness of which provides accurate valve control at high speed while keeping forces – and thus frictional losses – to a minimum. The cam profiles were also designed to improve these characteristics, with the use of VALDYN at the design stage helping eliminate any risk of loss of contact with the camshaft, spring surge or valve bounce.

The head casting went through a number of development phases after analysis of the first version revealed the potential for excessive temperatures in the exhaust bridge. Thermo-mechanical finite element analysis made it possible to evolve the design of the cooling passages and head gasket shaping to optimize the targeting and velocity of coolant jets, as well as making components easier to manufacture.

Cooling: critical for efficiency

Temperature control is critical to engine efficiency, and for this reason the V8 has a three-plate electrical thermostat which allows higher running temperatures during normal driving and ensures operating temperature is reached very quickly. The three-plate thermostat is effectively three-way or with three valves, so the unit can graduate cooling, something that is especially important during warm-up or during part load. It offsets the huge thermal changes between an engine capable of idling at a few hundred revs producing minimal power and maximum power of 600 PS at 7500 rev/min.

On that note, even the idle speed of the V8 was scrutinised and reduced to 600 rev/min from its initial target of 850. “The idle speed was important and driving that down was something we found we could do,” says Yates. “It benefits CO2 emissions and also the noise characteristic of the engine.”

Clearly, the sound quality of a supercar engine is crucial and a considerable amount of work was carried out to get the balance just right both inside and out. Because turbochargers significantly mute the wave form of intake noise, a sound transmission system incorporating a resonator was included to pipe sound to the cabin. The design of the exhaust system also took into account sound quality as well as efficiency. Like the cam covers, the entire inlet manifold is also moulded in plastic, reducing weight at the top of the engine to lower the centre of gravity.

The test regime was thorough and unforgiving. Five thousand hours of basic testing on seven dynamometers running in shifts served to check and validate every aspect of the new engine – from performance and emissions to mechanical durability testing of individual components. The work included thermal shock testing – the engine temperature rising to 116 Celsius at full power then being ‘crashed’ back to 20 Celsius using chilled coolant – a brutal process repeated hundreds of times to verify fatigue performance as well as severely checking the sealing of joints and components.

A further 3000 hours simulating the famous Nürburgring Nordschleife race circuit using real data logged during track testing there gave the equivalent of 73,000 km on-track driving. At the same time, major component and system-level testing was being carried out elsewhere on rigs in a combined test plan between Ricardo, McLaren and their suppliers. Final vehicle testing comprised more than 1,000,000 km on a mixture of road and track at Nardò, Idiada and the Nordschleife. The final stage prior to production was the building of 95 ‘made like production’ prototypes using production sequences and tools.

At the end of all of this, and just 18 months from the start of the collaboration with Ricardo, a unique new engine was born, possessing spectacular performance and emissions and easily meeting the high-level goals set by McLaren based on the exacting expectations of its very discerning customer base. The MP4-12C that it powers defines a completely new segment within the premium sports car market. To build a brand new car is a challenge; to build a brand new high-performance sports car that is ground-breaking, efficient, high-quality, lightweight, practical, dynamic, safe, comfortable, and visually arresting is a greater challenge still. McLaren – with help from Ricardo and other highly innovative supply chain partners – looks to have achieved this in considerable style.

And for Ricardo employees and investors, the new High Performance Assembly Facility also provides a proven approach for taking high performance, Ricardo-developed products into production applying world-class quality principles and practices within a lowvolume setting. As such, the facility is both a model factory and a business template that will be of keen interest to many potential customers seeking to add a halo, high-quality, performance product to their model line-up.

Partager cet article
Repost0
19 décembre 2011 1 19 /12 /décembre /2011 21:00

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced that the 2012 McLaren MP4-12C will not be subject to a federal gas guzzler tax.

Tony Joseph, Director of McLaren North America said: “Avoiding gas guzzler tax provides us with a unique advantage and selling point over our competitors. The 12C is unequalled in this segment.

“It was a priority to make this vehicle both high-performing, but also relatively modest in terms of overall carbon footprint. Thanks to its lightweight body, based around a carbonfiber MonoCell and developed through innovative engineering, we were able to achieve exactly that.”

The 12C is powered by a twin-turbocharged, 3.8-litre V8 which produces 592 bhp. 0-60 can be reached in 3 seconds, and the 12C can complete a quarter mile sprint in 10.4 seconds. Engineering the car for optimum fuel efficiency versus competitors in its market segment was a priority from the 12C’s inception.

Geoff Grose, Head of Vehicle Development said: “Class-leading fuel economy and low emissions are additional aspects of vehicle performance that we have worked hard to develop. Developing our own engine and transmission, together with pioneering lightweight technologies across the whole vehicle, has helped us achieve good results at the EPA and gives us a platform to develop for the future.”

The 2012 McLaren MP4-12C goes on sale throughout McLaren Automotive’s North American dealer-partners starting in late 2011. The car will have a base price of $229,000 in the US, with $2400 for destination and port processing.

Partager cet article
Repost0
10 décembre 2011 6 10 /12 /décembre /2011 10:00

111024 mclaren dunsfold609

Finally an almost positive review for the MP4-12C in a British magazine, but still not victory.

The MP4-12C shouldn’t be second. It should be on the top step, crowned Evo Car of the Year 2011. ‘I had my most memorable drive of the test in the MP4-12C and went faster than I would have thought possible,’ said Catchpole. ‘I expected it to be a bit bland and a bit computer-gamey but it’s not,’ said Porter. ‘There are moments when it’s doing stuff that goes much further than exposing its competitors in this test – it questions the fundaments of what a sporting car should be; how it should behave,’ said Harris. But it finishes second because almost all complimentary comments on the McLaren were followed by ‘…but…’.

When it was right, the McLaren was nigh-on untouchable, but almost from the moment its wheels hit the warm Portuguese asphalt it was troubled by niggles and issues. Some of us only experienced it as it should be late in the test. Then it was devastatingly effective, utterly engaging, ludicrously wieldy and fast; a car to show up the shortcomings of the Ferrari 458 which beat it in our summer group test issue. But…

‘There’s this feeling that you’re not driving the finished article,’ said Catchpole. And that’s what tempered the enthusiasm of too many of us. ‘It was so close,’ said Green. ‘Even if it had been on the standard brakes, it might have won. Maybe next year…’

Scans available @ German Car Forum.

Partager cet article
Repost0
2 décembre 2011 5 02 /12 /décembre /2011 21:00

Article en Français et Anglais / Article in French and English

AMS1st place: Ferrari 458 Italia

 Ce fut un combat serré, mais la Ferrai gagne parcxe qu'elle est plus mûre et plus rapide à la limite. / It was a tough battle, but the Italia won, because it's "more mature" and it's faster at the limit.

Pneus / Tyres: Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Poids / Weight: 1546 kg
Vmax.: 326 km/h
0-100 km/h: 3,5 s
0-200 km/h: 10,4 s
0-260 km/h: 19,2 s
0-400m: 11,3 s
Souplesse / Flexibility (80-120 km/h) in 5th/6th : 3,3s/4,6s
18 m slalom: 68,4 km/h
Test d'évitement / 110 m ISO evasive test: 155,3 km/h
Freinage (100-0 km/h) froid/chaud / Braking (100-0 km/h) cold/warm: 33,8 m/33,0 m

Hockenheimring: 1.09,7 min 

2nd place: McLaren MP4-12C

Elle est plus rapide que la 458, mais aussi plus chère, a quelques problèmes de qualité et pourrait être plus expressive en termes de son et de design / It's faster than the 458, but it's also more expensive, it has some quality-issues and it might be a bit more emotional in terms of design and sound.
Pneus / Tyres: Pirelli P Zero Corsa
Poids / Weight: 1483 kg
Vmax.: 330 km/h
0-100 km/h: 3,2 s 

0-200 km/h: 9,2 s
0-260 km/h: 16,7 s
0-400m: 10,8 s
Souplesse / Flexibility (80-120 km/h) in 5th/6th gear: 3,6s/5,9s
18 m slalom: 68,4 km/h
Test d'évitement / 110 m ISO evasive test: 153,5 km/h
Freinage (100-0 km/h) froid/chaud / Braking (100-0 km/h) cold/warm: 33,8 m/33,8 m
Hockenheimring: 1.09,5 min

Scans available / Scans disponibles @ German Car Forum.


Partager cet article
Repost0
28 novembre 2011 1 28 /11 /novembre /2011 21:00

Article en Français et Anglais / Article in French and English

mp4 in milano 0691copy

Après Sport Auto, la MP4-12C a participé à un autre essai marquant pour une automobile, l'édition annuelle du Club des 4 secondes du magazine italien Quattroruote. Cet essai a opposé cette année la Ferrari 599 GTO, la Porsche 911 GT3 RS 4.0, la Lamborghini Aventador et finalement la McLaren MP4-12C. Avec un temps de 1'13"860, la Lamborghini a établi un nouveau record sur le circuit d'essai du magazine, près d'une seconde plus rapide que la McLaren (1'14"815), elle même plus d'une seconde plus rapide que les autres rivales. Si le moteur de la Ferrari domine les débats (100/100), la McLaren domine quant-à elle sur le chapitre de la transmission (48/50), des freins (100/100, ex-aequo avec la Porsche) et la tenue de route (192/200). La Lamborghini l'emporte malgré tout d'une courte tête au total sur la MP4-12C, 878 à 871/1000. Relatif échec de la McLaren dans cet essai, car cette seconde place est malgré tout une belle reconnaissance de la part de la presse transalpine.

This test is one of the most significant in Europe after Sport Auto Supertest. Issued every year, it featured in 2011 Ferrari 599 GTO, Porsche 911 GT3 RS 4.0, Lamborghini Aventador and McLaren MP4-12C. With a lap time of 1'13"860, the Lamborghini has set a new track record for the magazine, almost one second ahead of the McLaren (1'14"815), more than one second faster than the two other cars. If the Ferrari's engine dominates (100/100), the McLaren wins 3 categories: transmission (48/50), brakes (100/100, ex-aequo with Porsche) and handling (192/200). Overall win goes however to the Lamborghini, shortly ahead of the McLaren, 878 vs 871/1000. This second place is nonetheless a good result for the McLaren, coming from an Italian magazine.

Scans disponibles / Scans available @ German Car Forum.

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 novembre 2011 6 05 /11 /novembre /2011 10:00

Article en Français et Anglais / Article in French and English

mp4 in milano 0349Un des essais majeurs de la presse automobile internationale est enfin disponible, le Supertest par Sport Auto en Allemagne. Je suis pas mal partagé par le résultat, qui est certes presque parfait, avec une note de 70/70 (mais un resultat sur piste mouillée faible, et celui-ci ne compte plus dans la note maintenant), mais en deça de la Porsche 911 GT2 RS. Les résultats apres mon introduction en anglais (avec quelques références de la Nissan GT-R MY2011).

One of the most significant test in the international press has been finally release, the German Sport Auto Supertest. If the 70/70 high score is a significant achievement, it hides the fact that wet handling result is poor (but does not count anymore in the score) and that on most categories, a 911 GT2 RS does better. Results below (including 911 GT2 RS as well as MY2011 Nissan GT-R for reference):

Nurburgring: 7.28 (GT2 RS: 7.24 / GT-R 7.36)
Hockenheimring: 1.08,7 (1.08,4 / 1.10,0)
0-100kph: 3.4s (3.5s)
0-200kph: 9.8s (9.8s)
Poids/Weight of tested car: 1451kg (1405kg)
Cw: 0.37 (0.35)
CwxA: 0.72 (0.71)
Deportance a 200kph AV/Downforce at 200kph front: 2kg (14kg)
Deportance a 200kph AR/Downforce at 200kph rear: 62kg (35kg)
200-0kph: 144.2m (126.6m / 129.2m)
36m slalom: 138kph (144kph / 140kph)
Mesure d'evitement/110 evasion meter test: 157kph (159kph / 155kph)

Circuit humide/Wet handling: 1.38,7 (1.38,7 / 1.35,0) 1/10 (très mauvais score/very poor result)

Plaisir de conduite/Driving pleasure: 10/10

Usage quotidien/Daily driver rating: 7/10

Scans available / Scans disponibles @ German Car Forum.

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 octobre 2011 7 23 /10 /octobre /2011 10:00

Reports of problems on early deliveries can be found everywhere on internet. It has been recognised officially in a letter sent by McLaren to its first customers. Read below:

"It is with both pleasure and frustration that I am writing to you at this early stage in your ownership of the McLaren MP4-12C. Pleasure because you are now part of our McLaren family and have bought into what I believe to be both the best car in its class, and the most exciting automotive adventure in decades; but frustration on a personal level because we have not yet been able to deliver on the high standards that we have promised and that should come as given with the McLaren brand. We have built up our McLaren businesses over the past decades based on our determination to be the best, and that is no different for the MP4-12C and all of our future cars.
When we began working on the MP4-12C, we were determined to deliver not only the best car in its class, but also the best ownership experience. We believe that the performance and driving experience of the MP4-12C is world class. However, along the road to achieving our goals, we will experience challenges. As you will have already heard from my staff, we are experiencing some early software bugs resulting in unnecessarily sensitive warning lights, battery drainage in certain conditions and IRIS performance issues. My team and the McLaren retailers are working with the pace and intensity that the McLaren brand demands to fully resolve these bugs rapidly and effectively to ensure that any inconvenience to you is kept to a minimum. It will however require your 12C to come back to your dealer at some point so that we can upgrade the software on your car. I hope that the way we deal with these issues sets us apart and is to the standard you would expect from McLaren.
We know you share our passion for racing, therefore as a token of my appreciation for your support during this time, your retailer will be giving you a pre-release copy of the new 'McLaren: The Wins' coffee table book. I hope that you enjoy the stories behind what makes McLaren winners and that this, in some small way, reminds you how much we appreciate your faith in us. We want to win on the road as well as the track, and we will work tirelessly to achieve this goal.
I would like to extend my personal thanks for your support and patience at this time. Should you have any questions, please contact your retailer in the first instance. Alternatively, please call my staff at McLaren Assistance on 0800 975 8285."

Source here.

Partager cet article
Repost0
20 octobre 2011 4 20 /10 /octobre /2011 21:00

mclaren mp412c 058With the end of the year getting closer, various "Car of the Year" issues are being pubish. This month, we have discovered the results of Autocar Britain's Best Driver Car 2011 and Auto Express Performance Car Of The Year 2011. Both are quite disappointing for any MP4-12C fan, with the car finishing in the middle of the pack. Both complain about various things, but mainly about lack of fun and the fact that the MP4-12C imposes a way to drive it - and that if you don't follow the way, you won't be efficient behind the wheel. Detailed judgment as follow.

Auto Express

Phenomenal pace and exceptional handling mark the new McLaren firmly in the top echelon of supercars.

The MP4-12C is a towering achievement, but it’s missing one vital commodity – the pure ability to thrill.

You get your kicks from the McLaren in a different way to the other cars in our line-up. Unlike the Ferrari, Mercedes or Jaguar, it’s not designed for the driver to switch off the electronic aids and play the hooligan on track. It only wants to be driven one way; smoothly and fast.

This single-minded pursuit of speed is understandable from a team that has made its name in Formula One, but in eking out the last one-hundredth of a second something has gone missing.The twin-clutch gearshift is one of the most rapid we’ve experienced, but you don’t get a satisfying blip of the throttle on downshifts.

Part of the blame lies with the engine. A V8 turbo is the pragmatic choice as it provides the best blend of performance and economy, but its uninspiring soundtrack simply doesn’t do the rest of the car justice. The chassis, meanwhile, is almost beyond criticism, as the amount of grip it generates is staggering.
However, the clever Brake Steer system (which applies the brakes to the inside rear wheel to prevent slip and contain understeer) detracts from the driving experience, rather than adding to it. And turnining it off isn't exactly encouraged by the complicated electronics.
If this all sounds a bit negative, that’s simply because expectations of the McLaren were so high. It has achieved what it set out to do, effectively matching the Ferrari 458 Italia for raw pace, so the MP4-12C really deserves plenty of praise.

Its phenomenal pace and exceptional handling rank it firmly in the top echelon of supercars. And it encourages you to drive neatly and precisely as you try to set the fastest lap time you can. We just wish it was a bit more fun while you did it.
Ranking: 5th.
Online article here.
Autocar
Transcript of the article published in Oct. 12th issue of the Magazine, written by Andrew Frankel.

Interestingly, there appears to be nothing fundamentally wrong with this car. It’s not too heavy or insufficiently stiff – indeed, it is the lightest, stiffest car in its class thanks to its carbonfibre monocoque. What niggles is an inescapable feeling that, in almost all areas, the car gives the impression that just a little more development time could have unleashed something quite extraordinary and less compromised.

We’ll look at its shortcomings in a minute, but it’s important to make clear that the McLaren does things no other car here can even think about. It was the quickest around the circuit by a clear second, and had we been at a more expansive facility like Donington or Goodwood, that gap would have grown wider. It packed the biggest punch (by far) and easily the swiftest, smoothest gearchanges. Grip levels from its optional Pirelli Corsa tyres were predictably heroic.

However, it impressed most over the bumps. Indeed, if you did a totally committed lap, using all the track and more by leaning on the kerbs in a way you’d never dream of doing in your own car, and then did exactly the same in any other contender, you’d think you were on a different facility altogether. When you cruelly banged the fully loaded outside wheels over some vicious-looking saw-toothed kerb, instead of rattling your teeth in your gums, the McLaren simply quivered momentarily and shot off up the road. At least some of its lap time comes from its ability to use bits of track you’d steer clear of in the others. Its brakes were also astonishing.

So why has a car that, a year ago, plenty of us would have named as the runaway favourite to win this contest come home squarely in the mid-field? The short answer is ‘confidence’, or lack thereof. Year after year, the car that wins this contest does so not because it is necessarily the fastest or the grippiest, or the one that does the biggest skids. It is the car that, before it does anything else, provides the driver with the confidence to wring its neck. If then it also turns out to have a surplus of all the more easily measured or observable talents, it’s in with a very good shot. Around Rockingham, none of us got the feeling that the McLaren was on the same page as the rest of us. As one tester it, and if we can be allowed to mix our metaphors, “no rider wants to be outwitted by the horse”.

There was no single failing that terminally undermined a potentially fine performance. In fact, there were several issues, some smaller than others, in most areas of its endeavour. Drivers complained about power delivery that caused such a big and sudden bang in the back at the exit of a corner that stability could be compromised. One tester observed that the gearbox could refuse downshifts when braking from high speed, another that the engine could have done with a sharper throttle map. There was one concern about the car’s rear-end stability when braking into a quick right that you approach over a left-hand brow, and another concerning its friendliness in the wet. A more general lament was its inherent desire to push its nose wide of the apex.

In short, none of us felt the car was on our side. It didn’t feel like it wanted throw you into the next postcode, but it did refuse to adapt to its driver. There was one way to drive the McLaren MP4-12C and that was its way. Do it any other way and it would soon point out the error in unambiguous terms. Which is why, for all the skills of its creators and the clever tech it carries, it failed to provide the driver with that crucial confidence.

Ranking: 6th

Full coverage on German Car Forum.

Partager cet article
Repost0

Recherche / Search

Liens / Links